Development talk:Team Fortress 2/Source Developer Asset Repository Leaks

Question

Why isn't my attempted edit fine? --Frying1Pans (talk) 18:09, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Because you just made it worse. "For ssomeone to have gained to the repository" L337 KR3W (talk) 18:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

You're butchering half the sentences you edit. 👍 Tyler 💬 ✏️ 🇨🇦 01:37, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

It's reasonable to assume they aren't giving this out anymore isn't it? Also, files from it have leaked, and people had to sign NDAs for it. --Frying1Pans (talk) 14:55, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

The recent leaks from January 2023 are still well available. I uploaded them to Internet Archive. The people who have legitimate access to the files did have to sign NDAs but that doesn't really matter when it comes to the leaks. Regardless, the wording is fine as it is. 👍 Tyler 💬 ✏️ 🇨🇦 02:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Question regarding the Taunt/Animation category.

For the unfinshed category, would we not include taunts/animations that were included in things such as the Postal 3 leak, as well as the ome time an update leaked a few animations also included in this leak (Think the slit throat for Soldier, the sit for Pyro, the battle cry secondary for Demo, ect.) It may be a stupid question, but it would elimimate a sizable portion of the taunts/animations included. -Bumbo Walrusoni (talk) 19:03, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure the unfinished Taunts/Animations category could feature taunts included in the 2023 gigaleak and maybe those taunts that you mention. Taunts found in the Postal 3 leak should probably stay on that page. --L337 KR3W (talk) 19:10, 12 February 2024 (UTC)